I’m Nadia Lodroman
Streamlining Transaction Matching in Oracle ARCS: A Deep Dive into Adjustments and Reconciliation Balancing
Nadia Lodroman • 4 April 2025
Listen to Tresora and Ledgeron's chatting about this blog post:
Navigating the Adjustment Paradox in Oracle ARCS Transaction Matching
Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud Service (ARCS)
is a powerful tool for streamlining reconciliation processes. Its Transaction Matching feature is particularly useful for comparing large volumes of data, identifying discrepancies, and ensuring accuracy. However, like any sophisticated system, it presents unique challenges that require careful navigation. One such challenge revolves around the use of adjustments and their impact on reconciliation balance.
The Purpose of Adjustments
In ARCS Transaction Matching, adjustments serve a crucial role: they allow users to reclassify items that shouldn't be part of the core reconciliation. This is particularly useful for items that need to be moved to a different account or require further investigation outside the standard matching process.
The Balancing Act: When Adjustments Throw Things Off
The problem arises when these adjustments are confirmed. While they correctly reclassify the items, they often cause the reconciliation to become out of balance. This is because ARCS treats these adjustments as real transactions, affecting the overall balance.
The Subsequent Correction: A Double Adjustment
To rectify this imbalance, users typically need to import an adjustment journal in the next transaction import cycle. This journal reclassifies the initial adjustment, effectively offsetting its impact on the reconciliation balance. However, this correction adjustment is often purely for ARCS purposes and doesn't require posting in the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system.
Why This Happens and How to Manage It
Understanding why this occurs is essential for effective management:
ARCS Accounting Treatment:
ARCS processes adjustments as actual accounting entries within the reconciliation, impacting the balance.
ERP vs. ARCS:
The ERP may not require these adjustments, leading to a disconnect between the two systems.
Best Practices and Recommendations
Here are some best practices to manage this situation:
- Clear Documentation: Maintain detailed documentation of all adjustments, including the reason for the adjustment and whether it requires an offsetting entry in the next cycle.
- Naming Conventions: Implement clear naming conventions for adjustment journals to distinguish between ERP-required and ARCS-specific adjustments. For Example, using a prefix such as "ARCS_ADJ" for adjustments that only exist for ARCS.
- Regular Reconciliation Reviews: Conduct regular reviews of reconciliation balances and adjustment activity to identify and correct any imbalances promptly.
- Process Standardisation: Establish a standardised process for handling adjustments, ensuring consistency across all reconciliations.
- Leverage Comments and Explanations: Use the comments and explanation fields within ARCS to provide context for each adjustment, making it easier to track and understand.
- Consider Custom Attributes: Explore using custom attributes in ARCS to flag adjustments that don't need ERP posting, streamlining the identification process.
- Training: Ensure all users are thoroughly trained on the adjustment process and understand the implications of confirming adjustments.
- Automation: If possible and if your organization uses EPM automate, create scripts that can automatically create and import these offsetting adjustment journals.
The Importance of Communication
Effective communication between the reconciliation team and the ERP team is vital. Ensuring that both teams understand the nature of these ARCS-specific adjustments can prevent confusion and streamline the reconciliation process.
Conclusion
While the adjustment paradox in Oracle ARCS Transaction Matching can be challenging, understanding the root cause and implementing best practices can help users maintain accurate and balanced reconciliations. By prioritising clear documentation, standardised processes, and effective communication, organisations can leverage the full potential of ARCS while minimising the impact of these unique adjustment scenarios.
Oracle FCCS has introduced a new "organisation by period" ownership engine, a significant enhancement allowing for more accurate and flexible financial consolidation.
This updated feature addresses the limitations of previous versions by enabling users to define ownership percentages that can change within a reporting period, rather than only at the period's start.
The sources highlight benefits such as increased accuracy, improved flexibility in handling mid-period ownership changes like acquisitions and divestitures, and enhanced auditability.
Ultimately, this development streamlines the management of complex ownership structures, leading to more reliable financial reporting and analysis for FCCS customers.
In the intricate landscape of corporate finance, the tax department often stands as a small but mighty force. While they may be one of the leanest teams within an organization, their impact reverberates throughout the entire company, influencing decisions made by CEOs, shareholders, investors, and even affecting relationships with customers and vendors. The accuracy and efficiency of their work are paramount. For years, tax professionals have relied on the familiar comfort of Excel spreadsheets to navigate the complex calculations of current and deferred tax provisions, track tax credits and losses, and manage tax liabilities across individual entities and consolidated groups. These spreadsheets, painstakingly crafted and meticulously maintained, have become trusted tools, a testament to the dedication and expertise of the tax team. However, the inherent limitations of manual spreadsheet-based processes are undeniable. The risk of errors, the time-consuming nature of recalculations, and the challenges of maintaining audit trails can create significant bottlenecks and potential liabilities. This is where Oracle Tax Reporting steps in, offering a powerful and secure solution to streamline and enhance the tax provision process. Why Oracle Tax Reporting? Powerful Tax Automation Engine: Oracle Tax Reporting's robust automation engine eliminates the need for manual calculations, significantly reducing the risk of errors and freeing up valuable time for strategic analysis. Recalculating tax provisions with the latest data, a task that could take hours or even days in Excel, can be achieved in minutes with 100% accuracy. Enhanced Auditability and Traceability: With built-in audit trails and comprehensive documentation, Oracle Tax Reporting provides complete transparency and traceability for all tax calculations. This ensures compliance with regulatory requirements and simplifies the audit process. Familiar Forms and Schedules: Oracle Tax Reporting offers a wealth of predefined forms and schedules that closely resemble the familiar Excel spreadsheets that tax professionals have come to rely on. This eases the transition and allows for a smooth adoption of the new system. Secure and Centralized Data Management: Oracle Tax Reporting provides a secure and centralized platform for managing all tax-related data, eliminating the risks associated with multiple versions of spreadsheets and ensuring data integrity. Efficiency and Accuracy: Imagine being able to recalculate your tax provision with updated data, and have the confidence to know the numbers are 100% accurate, within minutes. This is the power of Oracle Tax Reporting. Expert Consulting: A skilled consultant, equipped with both functional and business expertise, can play a pivotal role in implementing and optimising Oracle Tax Reporting. They can help tax teams leverage the full potential of the platform, ensuring a seamless transition and maximising efficiency. The Bottom Line: While Excel spreadsheets have served as a reliable tool for many years, the modern tax landscape demands a more robust and efficient solution. Oracle Tax Reporting empowers lean tax teams by automating complex calculations, enhancing auditability, and providing a secure and centralized platform for managing tax data. By embracing this powerful technology, tax professionals can focus on strategic analysis and value creation, knowing that their calculations are accurate, auditable, and completed efficiently.
Oracle Account Reconciliation (ARCS) is a powerful tool for streamlining your reconciliation processes. Its workflow automation rules offer significant time savings and ensure consistency. However, the "prevent" action, designed to halt workflow progression based on specific conditions, can be a double-edged sword. Misconfigurations can lead to unexpected roadblocks and frustration. Let's dive into how to get it right. The Power (and Peril) of "Prevent" Rules Workflow automation in ARCS allows you to define rules that trigger actions based on reconciliation attributes. The "prevent" action is particularly useful for enforcing compliance and quality standards. For example, you might want to: Prevent a reconciliation from being approved if supporting documentation is missing. Block a reconciliation if the period activity exceeds a certain threshold. Ensure critical fields are populated before moving to the next stage. However, the "prevent" action's strict nature means that even minor errors in rule setup can cause significant disruptions. Common Mistakes to Avoid Overly Complex Conditions: Complex rules with multiple conditions can be difficult to debug and maintain. Keep your conditions as simple and clear as possible. Incorrect Logical Operators: Using the wrong logical operators (AND/OR) can lead to unintended outcomes. Carefully consider the relationship between your conditions. Missing Edge Cases: Failing to account for all possible scenarios can result in rules that either fail to trigger when they should or trigger when they shouldn't. Lack of Clear Error Messages: Generic error messages provide little guidance to users. Make sure your custom error messages are specific and actionable. Testing Deficiencies: Insufficient testing can lead to rules that function differently in production than in development. Thoroughly test your rules with various data sets. Correct Setup Example: "Prevent" Rule Let's consider a scenario where you want to prevent a reconciliation from being submitted if an attachment is missing and the period activity is over $500,000 USD. Create Attributes: Set up a "Multi-Line Text Box" attribute for attachments with the "Required" option enabled for Preparers. Ensure you have an attribute that captures "Period Activity" as a number. Create a "Prevent Reconciliation Submission" Rule: Go to your format settings and create a new rule. Select "Prevent Reconciliation Submission" as the rule type. Set the condition to: "Attachment is missing AND Period Activity is greater than 500,000". Add a user-friendly message that will be displayed to the preparer if the rule is triggered, such as "Reconciliation cannot be submitted. Please attach the required documentation as the period activity exceeds $500,000." Testing: Thoroughly test the rule with various scenarios: Reconciliation with attachment and activity over $500,000 (should be allowed). Reconciliation without attachment and activity over $500,000 (should be prevented). Reconciliation without attachment and activity under $500,000 (should be allowed). Key Considerations User-Friendly Messages: Always provide clear and informative messages to the users when a "prevent" rule is triggered. This helps them understand why they cannot proceed and what actions they need to take. Thorough Testing: Testing is paramount. Create a comprehensive test plan that covers all possible scenarios and edge cases. Rule Maintenance: Regularly review your workflow automation rules to ensure they are still relevant and effective. As business processes change, rules may need to be updated or removed. By following these guidelines, you can effectively use workflow automation "prevent" rules in Oracle Account Reconciliation to enforce controls and improve the accuracy of your reconciliation process.
Phone IE: +353 (0) 86 96 1176
Phone RO: +40 749 390 230
Email: nadia@lodroman.com
powered by:
